Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
refers to law that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And exactly how They are really applied in certain types of case.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and contain all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion may be viewed as, however, we are very clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy matter to your approval of the competent authority.
three. I have read the realized counsel for the parties and have absent through the record of this case with their in a position assistance.
In this site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.
only around the ground of miscases remanded & only within the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
whether even though granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up as well as the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the various penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct is not ample however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful fashion. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is put in its place.
Criminal cases In the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil law systems, common law systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Until case is tried(Bail Matters)
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could 302 case law in pakistan allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only carried out In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )